Saturday, November 23, 2019

Ukrainian MP says Burisma head to be indicted, Hunter Biden slush fund n...

Posted by at No comments:

Friday, November 22, 2019

IG report will be an indictment of Adam Schiff: Rep. Ratcliffe

Posted by at No comments:

FBIlooking4EricCiariamellaWhistleblower

https://wethepeopledaily.com/2019/11/21/whistleblower-now-wanted-by-fbi/

The FBI has reached out to an attorney for the Trump-Ukraine whistleblower reported to be CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, who filed a complaint over President Trump’s July 25 phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodomyr Zelensky, according to Yahoo! News.
The move came after a vigorous internal debate at the agency over how to proceed with an investigation of allegations contained in the complaint, according to sources familiar with the matter.
According to the report, an FBI agent from the Washington field office reached out to whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid (The ‘Coup has started‘ guy who loves going to Disneyland alone), who declined comment for the article.
An interview with the whistleblower has yet to be scheduled.
The request from the FBI comes at a sensitive moment when Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee are making repeated efforts to “out” the whistleblower in order to suggest he may have had political motivations hostile to the president when he filed his Aug. 12 complaint with the intelligence community’s inspector general.
It also comes after multiple threats have been made against the whistleblower and his lawyers — some of which have been separately passed along by the lawyers to other officials at the FBI. But the agent who sought to question the whistleblower made no reference to the threats as the purpose of the interview, according to sources familiar with the discussions. –Yahoo! News
Yahoo suggests that an FBI interview will “introduce a new wild card into the debate over whether to impeach the president over his Ukraine dealings.”
Author: Tyler Durden
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

St.Paul,MNBudgetImpeach,Burisma,Bidens,GeorgeSoros

                                   Wed 20Nov2019
sanctuary city st. paul,mn Guilty of Bait and Switch, Theft by Swindle, Murder by Condemnation, Fiscal Disparitys, mandates reopen USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher re RICO ELEMENTS.
                      HOW Can one lowly Obama Clerk Eric Ciriamella cause Millions of Dollars, backed by George Soros vs USA 
#ImpeachmentHearings Burisma Holdings, Nikolai Zlochevsky, indicted in Ukraine, Ukrainian members of parliament demanding Trump and president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, investigate. $7.4 billion was laundered ex-President Yanukovych Franklin Templeton InvestDNC
       
City Council11/20/2019Export to iCalendar3:30 PMCouncil Chambers - 3rd Floor
Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m. There will be no meeting on Wednesday, November 27.		Meeting detailsAgenda Agenda
 Fighting City St. Paul,MN TO THE DEATH.
e:City CouncilAgenda status:Final
Meeting date/time:11/20/2019 3:30 PMMinutes status:Draft
Meeting location:Council Chambers - 3rd Floor
Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m. There will be no meeting on Wednesday, November 27.
Published agenda:Agenda AgendaPublished minutes:Not available
Meeting video:
Not available
Attachments:
 Add New Comment
File #Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
Min 19-4711/18/2019 8:11 PMAffiant SharonScarrellaAndersonAgainst
Councils refusal to read the entire records is Bizzare http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

Councils Violation fidicuary Trust is Criminal Intent also http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com
City shutting down Reason,Due Process testimony of Peter Butler, Eric Lien, Property Taxes on the Public 37 % is Cruel, Unjust,Arbitrary


              Watching Impeachments  always some
Impeachment Videos - Google Search Lawyer at Issue, Witness have to have lawyers
DFL Daniel Goldman  R Steve Carter

Late night ridicules congressman's impeachment ... - CNN.com

'It's Lt. Col. Vindman': Impeachment witness snaps back at Devin Nunes
https://www.cnn.com › videos › media › 2019/11/20 › late-night-impeachm...
26 mins ago
Late-night comedy hosts loved the moment Lt. Col Alexander Vindman corrected Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA ...



Obama should be cited 4 Treason  Foreign and Domestic
                     http://crimes-against-humanity.blgspot.com

                         Tues 19Nov2019
Lawsuit Filed to Defend Right to Film Mosque Violations
By the Grace of God  hanging tough     

                    http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com


improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. By November 2011, Newell had spent over two years discussing his case with career attorneys in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Minnesota, and the Civil Fraud Section within the Justice Department’s Civil Division. These three entities, which had each invested a substantial amount of time and resources into Newell’s case, regarded this as a strong case potentially worth as much as $200 million for taxpayers and recommended that the federal government join the suit. These career attorneys even went so far as to prepare a formal memorandum recommending intervention, calling St. Paul’s actions a “particularly egregious example of false certifications.” All this work was for naught. In late November 2011, Lillehaug made Perez aware of Newell’s pending case against the City and the possibility that the Justice Department may intervene. A trade was proposed: non-intervention in Newell’s case for the withdrawal of Magner. Perez contacted HUD General Counsel Helen Kanovsky and asked her to reconsider HUD’s support for intervention in Newell’s case. Perez also spoke to then-Civil Division Assistant Attorney General Tony West and B. Todd Jones, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, alerting them to his new interest in Newell’s case. The withdrawal of HUD’s support for Newell’s case led to an erosion of support in the Civil Division, a process that was actively managed by Perez.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch
Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Trump Impeachment Hearings US Rep. Stefanik grills Ambassor Yovanovicth ...

Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

MrsSharonAndersonakaPetersonakaScarrellaCitingCitySt.PaulGovernmentMS609RICO2019

                                            Wed.13Nov2019
                   TO THE ABOVE NAMED;   MS.609.43 AND Civil/Criminal Laws 
» Minnesota Statutes > Chapter 609 > RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (RICO)LawServe


                              THANK GOD FOR BUSINESS MAN REAL ESTATE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP AND HONEST LAWYER TOM FITTEN OF JUDICIAL 
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev, 20 F. Supp. 3d 247 | CasetextWATCH
                   has not replaced the Dead persons Kramer or Rybin.
Minnesota Civil Rights Laws - FindLaw
                                   Affiants VA Widow,White,Whistleblower has Standing to file Civil/Criminal/Constitutional Complaints, using City Council Agenda's 6Nov2019 and today 13Nov2019 Objecting to Consent Agenda's failure to decend to particulars.

                                     QUESTIONS MS 609.43
                     1.  Has/Have City Government by Bogus DSI Inspectors created Charter Violations, without decending to particulars, in violations of Canons of Construction.
9-39.000 - Contempt Of Court | JM | Department of Justice

                     2.  Is the City St. Paul,MN IN Contempt of City Charter
Is City St.Paul in Contempt of City Charter - Google Search

                    3, Has Candidate VA Widow,White,Whistleblower Mrs. Sharon Scarrella Anderson for Decades IN her realestate been reduced to poverty, currently the Bizzare of City Billing Sharon $157.oo monthly at 4.5 interest compounded daily. since 2007 
Sharon4CouncilWard2: St.Paul Guilty FTC Consumer Fraud
                            a,  http://sharon4anderson.org    currenthttp://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com
                                  i.  Magner by info and belief still employeed in City St. Paul,MN, BUT FOR lives and pays taxes in Stillwater.
                                    ii.   MUST be reopened for Damages
magner v. gallagher - Google Search
Defamed by the DFL Paryt along with USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher. 
                            b,.  
The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice.


RES 19-1917 The Right of Privacy in your own Home 
2001-0791.resp.pdf
           Ordinance obtained via Misleading Information, Isiah church must lose tax exempt status Title 26 501c3

City Council11/6/2019Export to iCalendar3:30 PMCouncil Chambers - 3rd Floor
Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m.		Meeting detailsAgenda AgendaNot availableVideo Video

RES 19-184819Excessive/Abatement Service June 24 to July 22, 2019
RES PH 19-359252Setting the 2020 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer rate

Chicago, e
City Council11/13/2019Export to iCalendar3:30 PMCouncil Chambers - 3rd FloorMeeting detailsAgenda Agenda
t al v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.  This meeting is closed to the public.
Agenda
City Council11/6/2019Export to iCalendar3:30 PMCouncil Chambers - 3rd Floor
Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m.		Meeting detailsAgenda AgendaNot availableVideo Video


Minnesota Supreme Court Opinions

Docket: A19-0916
Opinion Date: October 16, 2019
Judge: Lorie Skjerven Gildea
Areas of Law: Election Law, Government Contracts
The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the district court directing the City of Saint Paul to put a referendum question regarding the City's ordinance that established organized waste collection in the City on the ballot for the next municipal election, concluding that holding a referendum on the issue will not unconstitutionally impair the City's contract with haulers that provide organized waste collection. The City refused to put the referendum question on the ballot, concluding that the referendum was preempted by state statutes that govern solid waste collection, conflicts with state policy, and would by an unconstitutional interference with the City's contract with the haulers. Respondents with filed a petition challenging the City's refusal. The district court granted the petition. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the City has not demonstrated that a substantial impairment of its contractual obligation will occur with the referendum vote, and therefore, the Court need not address the other two factors.

                              Tues 12Nov2019
                         Service Electronically
                                 Constitutional Questions,Consent Agenda,  Corrupt Practices Act, CRIMINAL RICO acts by Council enbanc,Lawyers,Government Officials. Marcia Mormond Legislative hearing Officer without Realestate or LAW License.
                                 Illegal Creation of Debt without Notice,Due Process.TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxesv2019
                     Sharon 'Aint Dead Yet' http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com
​
Upcoming EventsHelp?
NameDate  
Housing & Redevelopment Authority on 2019-11-13 2:00 PMNovember 13, 2019 - 02:00 PM  
City Council on 2019-11-13 3:30 PMNovember 13, 2019 - 03:30 PMAgenda
Fat lady not signing  Trying to consolidate Files Cases etc.
                     Currently going after the Law LICENSE OF Rachael Tierney council to City Council and Chris Tolbert Separation of Powers City Council,Dual Asst.Hennepin Co. Attorney, Mike Freeman should fire
City Attorneys-Cop Corruptionolbert.


                        so much out there Thanks to Google etc.
                     Pattern by Law
Sharons QuiTam_RICO62cv10-112_Manatronyers,Judges to deny Pro Se Persons Access to Due Process,





Justia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Eighth Circuit › 1979 › Dick Bullock et al., Appellants, v. State of Minnesota et al., Appellees
Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Enter your email.

Dick Bullock et al., Appellants, v. State of Minnesota et al., Appellees, 611 F.2d 258 (8th Cir. 1979)

Annotate this Case


U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 611 F.2d 258 (8th Cir. 1979)Submitted Dec. 20, 1979. Decided Dec. 28, 1979
Rev. Dick Bullock, Rev. Sharon Scarrella, and Rev. Lyle V. Rambo, pro se.
Erica Jacobson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., for appellees.
Before HEANEY, ROSS and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their pro se civil rights suit against the State of Minnesota and several of its executive officers. Plaintiffs claim: (1) Minnesota Secretary of State Joan A. Growe's refusal to file nonattorney plaintiff Scarrella's papers for the office of Minnesota Supreme Court Justice pursuant to a Minnesota constitutional provision restricting candidacy to "individuals admitted or entitled to be admitted to the practice of law in Minnesota" violated Scarrella's civil rights, and (2) membership in the Minnesota legislature of lawyers violates the separation of powers clause of the Minnesota constitution.
The district court dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343 and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Plaintiffs appealed, and defendants filed this motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Local Rule 9(b). Because we find that we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we deny defendants' motion to dismiss.
We have carefully reviewed the record and find that the district court properly dismissed the separation of powers claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiffs' claim is based entirely upon the Minnesota constitution, and does not, therefore, present a federal question.
Although we do not agree with the district court that plaintiffs' constitutional challenge to the candidacy restriction is barred by res judicata, we affirm the district court's dismissal for the reason that this argument is without merit.
The right to regulate elections and prescribe qualifications for statewide political offices is reserved to the states under the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution. See Antonio v. Kirkpatrick, 579 F.2d 1147, 1150 (8th Cir. 1978); See also Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 141, 92 S. Ct. 849, 31 L. Ed. 2d 92 (1972). States may not, however, regulate in a manner that violates equal protection. See Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23, 29, 89 S. Ct. 5, 21 L. Ed. 2d 24 (1968).
The Supreme Court has indicated that the standard of review in access to public office cases must be determined by weighing the interests involved and the nature of the barrier's impact upon voters. See Bullock v. Carter, supra, 405 U.S. at 143, 92 S. Ct. 849; Antonio v. Kirkpatrick, supra, 579 F.2d at 1149. We do not decide which level of scrutiny is appropriate in the instant case because we conclude that the provision withstands constitutional scrutiny under both the rationally related and strict scrutiny tests.
The equal protection clause does not prohibit a state legislature from adopting more rigorous standards for ensuring excellence in the judiciary than for other elective offices. See Trafelet v. Thompson, 594 F.2d 623, 627 (7th Cir. 1979). The requirement that candidates be eligible to practice law in Minnesota clearly advances the state's compelling need to obtain candidates who are qualified to understand and deal with the complexities of the law.
We conclude, therefore, that the restriction does not violate the equal protection clause.
We have also reviewed Judge Alsop's other rulings, including his refusal to recuse himself and find no error.
For the reasons stated above, the order dismissing this suit is affirmed.
xx

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella Removal Dhs QuiTam Relator to State Court | United States Constitution | Federal Government Of The United States
Blogger: User Profile: Sharon4Anderson
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch









Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch
In a message dated 11/12/2019 12:17:49 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:

 Tues 12Nov2019
                         Service Electronically
                                 Constitutional Questions,Consent Agenda,  Corrupt Practices Act, CRIMINAL RICO acts by Council enbanc,Lawyers,Government Officials. Marcia Mormond Legislative hearing Officer without Realestate or LAW License.
                                 Illegal Creation of Debt without Notice,Due Process.TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxesv2019

 Current Candidate State Senate 64 Trump Republican
LEGAL NOTICE:

xx

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Minnesota Court Fraud-Treason

Minnesota Court Fraud-Treason
Forensic Evidence Jim & Sharon Anderson 20+Marriage